"Do I really look like a man with a plan?"
- Heath Ledger as the Joker in The Dark Knight
There are so many things to address with this, so it may take a little while. A quick disclaimer: there is some language, not much, but some. Don't judge me.
There's been quite a ruckus at
town hall meetings across the country, as opposition to the President's socialist
health care plan has risen substantially. And as would be expected, the supporters of the policy and the president, these democrats in Congress, and to a large extent, the media, have cast these protesters as extremists. And they call these
town hall meetings theatre. Paul
Krugman, columnist for the New York Times even shocks everybody that has bothered to breathe by citing racial fears of a black president as the reason for the opposition to universal
health care. I'll have to check with Thomas
Sowell, Clarence Thomas, Colin Powell,
JC Watts, Walter Williams,
Condi Rice, and well you get the drift, to see if their opposition or at least criticisms of such a plan are motivated by the fear of a black president. So Mr.
Krugman, do us all a favor and stick to teaching economics at Princeton, so college juniors such as myself don't embarrass you on a regular basis.
Anyway, it is quite remarkable how these democrats have suddenly turned cold against the idea of
town hall meetings, letting citizens speak their voice, and dare I say, some damn CHANGE. This past week, a controversy was stirred up over a poster with Obama on it, sporting the Heath Ledger joker-style makeup. The accompanying word was socialism. "Politically mean spirited" was how I heard it described. More politically mean spirited than the tired old "Bush Lied, People Died" shirts, posters,
bumper stickers, hats? Once again, get over yourselves. The
health care plan is socialistic in its design. And it's a joke. What's there to discuss? One of the things that was always so frustrating about George W. Bush was how his biggest supporters blindly defended him. And now we are seeing that surpassed under President Obama.
But let's get to the actual plan and its flaws and contradictions, and the hypocrisy of these people.
1. The President's position is that the "status
quo" can no longer remain. This current system bankrupts families, business and government. However, as he puts it, "if you are happy with your plan and doctor, stick with it." So let me get this straight. It's an irreversible disaster, but we can stick with it if we choose to and not be harmed. Hell, give me one of those joker posters.
2. Another main supporting argument behind this plan is that it will save money and be a cost-cutting measure, despite the fact that the Congressional Budget Office (about as non-partisan as you can get in today's political world) says that these proposals will increase
health care spending, putting us even further behind budget.
3. Barack the Magician says we can cut down
health care costs while theoretically providing health insurance to approximately 50 million more people. If any of you believe this, here's what you do. You take some aluminum foil, put it on your head, go sit in a closet, and turn out the lights. Then just sit there and think a while.
4. Now let's get to the uninsured, who won't have the option to get covered by the government plan. No, they will be MANDATED to get it. So people in my age group, who are healthy and rarely sick and choose not to be covered right now get stuck with paying increased premiums that will be more than any medical expenses in the long run because they didn't get the mandated coverage. Mr. President, if you can sense my middle finger pointing in your direction, I'd say you're a good guesser.
5. It's understood that the
health care issue is critically important, and getting it right is critical, regardless of whether you support the universal system or not. But rather than making sure it's done right, these buffoons want to ram this legislation through Congress, not allowing time for it to be READ (wow, there's a radical freaking idea) and debated thoroughly. "We don't have time for that! It's morally imperative!" goes the generic democratic response. "And it will work just like the stimulus did when we rushed it through." (Even though the stimulus has done the complete opposite.) Well, it must not be too pressing, seeing as we can keep our plan and doctor if we want..supposedly. How about you put the entire thing on the Internet for us citizens to see? Isn't that what you promised, Mr. President? More transparent government? Bull.
6. One of the main determinations of the health care reformers has been not to screw it up like they did in 1994 with President Clinton. They say they have strayed away from all the tactical and procedural measures that doomed it the first time. But the plan itself hasn't changed much. Mandates, more regulations of insurance companies, government-managed markets. And a bonus "public option" open to all people and run by our government, which does such a wonderful job running things. The bottom line (That's what Joe
Biden says all the time, usually when he is lying, but I'm not lying.) is that it is intellectually dishonest and condescending for these people to tell me that this plan will cut costs of
health care by expanding coverage to 50 million more people and that even though this current system is unsustainable, I can still keep my plan and doctor and not be harmed.
7. Really one of the big goals is to bankrupt the insurance companies. It's people like John Edwards who constantly gripe about the way these companies pick and choose what to cover and what not to cover. Under this proposed system, these companies will be forced to cover everything. Let's use a little damn common sense. That will only bankrupt the insurance companies. And if the companies don't go bankrupt, by covering all this extra stuff, they will have to raise the cost of insurance. So assuming the
CBO's estimates are accurate, and assuming this proposed system goes into effect, that means the government will be forced to look at cost-cutting measures. It most likely will be a combination of significantly high tax increases (making it harder on the people they claim to want to help) and DECIDING WHAT PROCEDURES AND MEDICINES TO COVER AND NOT TO COVER. It's amazing how
stand up comedians even make a living in this country. If people just turned on the news and opened their ears, they'd get all the comedy they need.
8. Essentially, you're going to have a government-run bureaucratic system with all these assholes in suits overruling experienced and trained doctors on what to do all for the reason of bringing down the costs of
health care. And by the way, where do you get all the new doctors to cover all these extra people?
9. Sometimes it's best to look at countries with these systems in place. Take Canada for instance. There are thousands of
Canadians crossing over to get medicines and treatments here that it takes way too long to get over in Canada. And the reason they do that, plain and simple, is because despite what our politicians and President say, we have the best quality of medical care in the world.
10. This whole idea of the government controlling what procedures you can get covered for, what medicines you can get, what doctors can do is nothing new. It's just the same old tired business of the government getting a little more control of our life. A direct slap in the fact to the country's founding documents.
11. This is really for a different blog, but no matter how politically correct or rhetorically appealing it may sound, health insurance is not a right.
These politicians need to understand this opposition is not just from what they try to make people perceive as extremists. It's real opposition that may very well cost the democrats the House of Representatives in 2010 and worse in later elections. It's important for us citizens to educate ourselves about this issue and be able to call this bullshit when we see it. We just need to ask ourselves these basic questions.
1. If this system will be cost-effective and productive, then why are there so many problems with systems that are government-run, such as medicare, medicaid and veterans hospitals?
2. How can you cut
health care costs by providing insurance to 50 million more people?
3. If it is imperative to fix the system, why do they insist we can keep our plan and doctor if we like? Does that imply if we choose the government option, which why wouldn't we if it's supposedly more cost effective, that we will be an overload on the system, thus throwing the plan on its face?
4. And finally, why are so many people coming over from countries like Canada to PAY for care here?
Many people in this country are acting like dogs running for a stick, but I'm not these people's dog.